by Revilo P. Oliver
I DO NOT APOLOGIZE for the amount of space that I devote in these pages to Christianity. It is one of the cardinal facts with which we must deal, as crucial as such menaces as the Federal Reserve or the current antics of our rulers in the District of Corruption.
A very large part of the American population professes a belief in some variety of Christianity, and the great majority of professed infidels have minds that are dominated by a residue of the superstition they imagine they have rejected.
A friend of mine who attends a salvation-shop because it offers him one of his few opportunities to exercise his excellent baritone, tells me that last Sunday the dervish emphatically assured his congregation that Christian luff requires welcoming into the United States not only all “political refugees” (i.e., all talking anthropoids that say that is what they are), but also all “economical refugees,” by which he meant all of the world’s anthropoid vermin that want to become parasites on stupid Aryans and be supported by their labors.
One cannot tell, of course, what part of the audience was listening to the holy rant rather than meditating on what they would have for dinner or the hazards of the course on which they would play golf in the afternoon, but the harangue must have penetrated the consciousness of many, and, according to my friend, not one of the sheep protested the subversive proposal further to enslave them and exterminate their children, either at the time or in conversation after they emerged from the sacred precincts. And the same poison must have been dispensed to millions of other mutton-heads in many thousands of other churches that very morning and on every Sunday of the year.
That is a fact with which we must deal if we hope to arouse a sense of self-preservation in the members of our self-doomed race. What happens in religion is really more important to us than what happens in economics. That is why I now write to recommend a very valuable reference work.
I have often cited Christian News as the best single source of information concerning events and tendencies in all religious cults in the United States. I have also commended its editor for qualities that are extremely rare in religious, as well as secular, journalism today: honesty and courage. He reproduces the news accurately, by photographic reprinting wherever feasible, and undistorted by editorial comment, which is sometimes subjoined as a clearly separate item.
The honesty is evinced, inter alia, by the publication of news that the high-powered promoters and sales managers of his denomination want suppressed as bad for business. The courage, inter alia, by the Reverend Mr. Herman Otten’s address at the last convention of the Institute for Historical Review, in which he forthrightly denounced the Jews’ great Holohoax, thus bringing on himself the specially intense hatred of the world’s venomous parasites.
We must recognize in the editor another virtue that it is easy to overlook. His premises are the authentic Lutheran variety of a religion which we regard as illusory and, in its effect on our race, ultimately pernicious, but he states those premises clearly and without ambiguity, and he adheres to them consistently. He is an antithesis to self-styled “Liberals” in both religion and secular affairs.
The American Atheist’s Insider’s Newsletter, July 1988, devoted its first dozen pages to the pests who call themselves “Liberal intellectuals,” and quoted Mrs. Madelyn O’Hair as saying: “Give me a fascist any day as an opponent. He states his principles and stands on them. I know whence he comes and why. I can meet him in opposition because I understand what he represents. The liberals are based in quicksand; there is no way — ever — to rely on what they say or understand their intentions.” Its editor goes on to remark, “A liberal is a glad-hander,…glossing over with talk the enormous problems of our time.” That is essentially true, for the “Liberal’s” purpose is to make whatever spiel will enlist the support of the unthinking for whatever project he is promoting for reasons he instinctively conceals.
It is always a great relief to deal with men who mean what they say and say what they mean. Would that the opportunity to do so were not so rare!
Christian News is a tabloid of twenty-four or more densely printed pages, published weekly, except for a short intermission in August. The issues accumulate rapidly and strain the resources of any reader who does not have adequate secretarial assistance for systematic indexing and filing. The editor, however, has reprinted in thick tabloid-size volumes the articles which he regards as most important; they are arranged alphabetically be subject, and there are good indices of both subjects and persons. Volumes I and II of the Christian News Enclyclopaedia cover 1973-1983 and contain, in addition to some supplemental material, pages 1-1773. Volumes III and IV, containing pages 1774-3242, cover 1984-1988. The work is published in both cloth-bound and paperback editions. (1) Despite the large pages and thickness of the volumes, I find the latter satisfactory.
(1. The Encyclopaedia may be obtained from the Lutheran Publishing Co., P.O. Box 168, New Haven, Missouri (63068))
The value of this work of reference extends beyond its scope. Let me give one example.
In the issues for 25 July and 1 August 1988, the Reverend Mr. Otten reproduced photographically 177 pages from the Soncino translation of the Babylonian Talmud. His purpose was to illustrate the Kikes’ inveterate, frenzied, and unappeasable hatred of “Christians,” as their frantically contumelious terms are commonly translated. (Writing at a time when the peoples of Europe had accepted the export brand of the Yahweh-cult, a reference to Christians was equivalent to ‘Aryans,’ and they may not have known a precise term for our race, which they hate above all others and intend to exterminate.) These reproductions are included in the Encyclopaedia‘s section on the Talmud, Vol, IV, pp. 3102-3129.
Recently some ostensibly anti-Jewish trouble-makers, either enemy agents or pipsqueaks trying to make a loud noise, have taken to saying they have done lots o’ research and found that what Professor Arthur R. Butz’s reports on pp. 246-247 of his masterly and epochal work, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, about earlier holohoaxes just ain’t so, whence it follows that nothing Professor Butz says can be believed.
On the pages in question, Professor Butz remarked that when the Sheenies devised their earlier holohoaxes, they lied with less restraint than when they finally settled on six million as the number of God’s masterpieces that the wicked Nazis gassed or incinerated or parboiled or vaporized. The figures they shamelessly gave in earlier fictions were patently incredible and flatly impossible. One example referred to the end of the Jewish revolt that began in A.D. 132 when a christ who called himself Bar-Kokhba (“Son of the Star”), (2) persuaded his ferocious fellow tribesmen that old Yahweh said the time had come to help him butcher the civilized Greeks and Romans. The Yids were able to catch the hated Aryans off guard and gleefully torture many of them to death, but soon the Roman legions moved in and old Yahweh skedaddled in a hurry, leaving his pets in the lurch.
(2. His real name, as was discovered since Professor Butz wrote, was Shimeon bar Kosiba.)
The bloody barbarians made their last stand in the small hilltop town of Bethar, which had an inhabited area equivalent to five or six city blocks today. The Romans took the fortified town, of course, but they probably mistakenly followed their custom of sparing non-combatants. The number of fleeing Jewish partisans who took refuge in the town cannot have exceeded ten or twenty thousand, and the survivors were certainly killed in reprisal for the treacherous murder of so many civilized men and women. Professor Butz reports the number of slain given by the Jews in one of their usual efforts to jerk tears over slaughter of pure-hearted and godly innocents by hard-hearted Aryans. The figures are utterly absurd and they are probably what excited the malversational itch of the trouble-makers.
Now, as a matter of fact, Professor Butz’s source was the holy and unerring Talmud itself, and in his summaries of what it says, he was not only impeccably accurate but always careful to cite the lower of the unbelievable figures given in it, when there were variants. (3)
(3. When citing the distance that the great flood of holy blood flowed from Bethar to the sea, Professor Butz gives the reading “four miles,” and does not even mention the variant, “forty miles,” which is certainly correct, because that is the approximate distance from Bethar to the Mediterranean.)
Now Christian News did not reprint all of the passages that were Dr. Butz’s source, but it did include obiter parts of two of them. In one of these (No. 37 in the series of reproductions), we are told that when the wicked Romans took Bethar, they wantonly slew 400,000 x 10,000 (= four billion) sweet Sheenies. That figure could have been excogitated only by a kind of insanity that seems innate in the race, (4) and one can see why pipsqueaks with cerebral oedema would think it a vulnerable point when they wanted to claim they had done “research.” The same passage gives a variant, also duly reported by Professor Butz: the horrid Romans killed only forty million (4000 x 10,000) of Yahweh’s darlings in little Bethar.
(4. Jews perpetually whine about persecution to befuddle their intended victims, but when they try to give details, they let their morbid imaginations run riot. For example, when the Babylonian king, Nabu-kudur-usur took Jerusalem in 597 B.C., he probably did execute the leaders of the faction that had betrayed the territory to the invading Egyptians, but he left the local government in the hands of Jews who had not compromised themselves with the invaders. But we are assured in the Talmud that, as certified by the testimony of an eyewitness (who was doubtless like the “eyewitnesses” in the most recent Holohoax), the captain of the Babylonian guard, presumably all by himself, slew 2,110,000 sacred Sheenies, and slew 40,000 of them on just one stone. Stout fellow! Think what such an athlete could do in the Olympics today!)
The lower figure, 40,000,000, is significant, for with it we come to the recent Holohoax. When the Yids concocted it as a device to paralyse the minds of gullible Aryans with fictitious guilt, they first thought of 40,000,000 as a good figure, but, having some qualms that the credulity of Aryans might not be quite infinite, they reduced it to 25,000,000, as in the famous “confessions” extorted from Gerstein, and then prudently decreased it to 12,000,000, before finally settling of 6,000,000 as the largest figure the boobs would accept without question. This figure is again habitual in Jewish bunkum. In the early years of this century Americans were assured that six million sweet Sheenies were suffering persecution in Russia (where the Czarist government was unable to restrain peasants from occasionally turning on their parasites). (5)
(5. On the wildly exaggerated ‘pogroms,’ see the article, “Russian Jews and Gentiles,” by Mme. Z. Ragosin, a contemporary of the events, in Liberty Bell, June 1985.)
Another specimen of Hebrew mathematics, also cited by Professor Butz, is found in No. 39, where we are assured that within Bethar’s inhabited area, about equal to five or six of our city blocks, there were 400 x 400 x 400 (= sixty-four million) schoolchildren, and that the cruel Aryans heartlessly slew all of those darling little Yiddish moppets.
These figures guarantee the accuracy of the others cited by Professor Butz, so that a simple reference to the Christian News Encyclopaedia will suffice to expose the impudence of the trouble-makers and show that their vaunted “research” consisted of asking a rabbi — on the charitable assumption they consulted more than their own troublous imaginations.
The insanely exaggerated statistics given in the Talmud were, of course, long known only to Jews, who alone could read the odd dialect of Aramaic in which it is written, and, indeed, the Talmud enjoins that goyim who may learn to read it must be murdered, but it was doubtless intended that the stories should inspire members of the race in their whining to the hated Europeans about the “persecutions” the tribe of swindlers and usurers innocently suffered because they were such innocuous, pure, and godly beings.
Even apart from the biggest of the Jews’ Big Lies in our time, every Aryan should know something of the fetid racial mentality that is revealed in the Talmud, and the pages reprinted in Christian News are about all that an Aryan, even one with a strong stomach, can read without nausea.
It is a truism that, as the Japanese say, you cannot understand the world of today without perceiving and measuring the activity of the ubiquitous and omnivorous Jews; and you cannot understand Jews without pondering an adequate and typical sample of their Babylonian Talmud, which reveals their mentality and racial soul. That is the one indisputably authentic key to the operation of minds and instincts that are so utterly alien to Aryans as to seem incredible until proved by irrefragable evidence, the divinely authoritative writings that the predatory race kept from its prey as long as it could.
There are several good analyses of the authoritative Talmud, chiefly in German, on which I have commented elsewhere, but they do not have the instant cogency of photographic reproductions of pages from the Jews’ own official translation, which omits only a few drastic passages that are found in the early printed editions of the text and cited in the compendium by Joseph Caro, Sulhan ‘Aruk (1564). Even if you are still reluctant to accept the verdict of sagacious Romans, who finally realized that the Jews are the hostes generis humani, you can no longer doubt when you read in their own words proof of the insane megalomania which teaches that only Jews are human beings, while Aryans and all other races are animals, like sheep and pigs, whom Jews are divinely authorized to kill whenever they think it expedient — animals who, by their nature, can own no property, so that whatever is in their possession belongs by right to the first Jew who takes it. And when you have learned that, read on, so long as you can stand the stench.
* * *
Source: Liberty Bell magazine, November 1989